We’re here for AI, at least to have AI suggestions based on the quality, video type and bluriness some kinda stuff. I’m not sure if it’s possible to have this, but an auto detect feature from AI could help a lot of people asking for help because they don’t know what to choose. I would like to have the balance between them. ![]() It’s like choosing to smooth out the details or having artifacts. I mean… I can’t find the sweet spot at all. Theia is great, but the customization range is short. Anyway, a 1080i deinterlace without doubling the framerate would be nice (if that’s possible). I had to use Gaia CG and let Youtube deinterlace the movies for me. I really like to deinterlace, but the artifacts are holding me back. At least for now.ĭione should have a model like Gaia CG which is stable, and without sharpness. That way, everyone is satisfy with the result because AI can never be better than human eyes. Let users control the sharpness and colors would be a huge improvement than trying to improve Artemis models which have too many artifacts here and there. It’d be better to have that than updating the current good models (Artemis especially). Also let people keep the old models in the beta version.Ī model like Gaia with customizations like Theia will be a thumb up for me. So everyone can just download it and test it with the older models. I prefer having a beta testing channel for new models without installing a new VEAI beta everytime. Models are not getting better, but getting worse. 0.31s/f => 0.40s/f you must be kidding me. But I also want to improve VEAI, so I decide to stay with v.2.2.0 and give out the opinions to the devs and hope they would make some changes. But for people who are working on movie projects like me, 30% time is about more than 1 hour running for a 25m episode, you see the problem right? High power comsumption, longer time for each movie/episode, slower preview frames. It took me longer to navigate things and double check to see if I have the correct options. It’s better to stay at v2.1.0 because v.2.2.0 is such a downgrade to me. But for well established methods of compression it hides any useful info.Honestly, this new version v2.2.0 should not be released. ![]() Which is really strange to use even less user friendly, arbitrary numbers while at the same time offering large thumbnails and examples an tutorials in the program for AI models. Besides, ffmpeg as powerful as it is, it is also notoriously not user friendly. Or any other method of compression we are using needs to be clearly labeled and listed and allow users to change, otherwise its working half blind if not totally blind. What is the bit rate and what is the file size based on bit rate. ![]() We need well established numbers that we can use as targets so we can not work half blind. At the maximum value of 35, the quality would be bad.”īut that is like asking people how do you cook eggs, and the guy say, cook it until you feel it its ok. At a value of 15, it’s a good compromise, in my opinion. ![]() All I know is a value of 0 means lossless output but very large file, and 20 means much smaller file but compression artifacts will be visible to some extent. Topaz Photo AI supercharges your image quality so you can focus on the creative part of photography. Sharpen, remove noise, and increase the resolution of your photos with tomorrow’s technology. “I do hope Topaz will clarify, but I think compression factor 20 and CRF 20 are one and the same, as Topaz uses ffmpeg for video output. Maximize your image quality, on autopilot. I hope someone from Topaz team can explain it, and they can rework the interface for future releases so it makes sense and it is not only consistent within the Topaz interface and applications, but also consistent in regards to standards used by most applications already. Thank you for your link, but I remain with more questions than answers, sadly. Trained on thousands of videos and combining information from multiple input video frames, Topaz Video AI will enlarge and enhance your footage up to 8K. Its like four different developers worked on it, and no one talk to each other. There is not even “?” little tool-tip indicator for it, even if there is one for “keep audio” option. Is it 20x factor or 20% of something? And of what? I’m sad to say, the user interface design in that instance is amateur. Everything from bit rate, bit depth, color space etc, but not compression factor, whatever that means. There is a whole slue of terminology mentioned in most programs. There is no reference I can find or explanation. Thanks for the reply, but Constant Rate Factor (CRF) mentioned in the FFMPEG guide, is not the same as compression factor mentioned in the Topaz interface.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |